Wolf Europe, Wolf Europe, Wolf Europe Calling..
I'd like to take this occasion to address a few issues touched upon in the last show, which are of enough importance to race to bear further clafificationI suppose that I didn't get into it more because it seems a bit stuffy academic, but now that I consider it more, it is relevant, very..
I was talking about Modernity and, roughly speaking, that began with the so-called Enlightenment, those fitugures whom I'd mentioned in the first Wolf Europe show, Descartes, and the Empiricists Locke and Hume.Now, let me explain how that is relevant ot Aryans in terms of what the Enlightenment was tying to do and how it affects what people think and are trying to do, even now, despite all this talk of post modernity in recent years.
Modernity, in effect, is the the quest for foundational truth, it began with Descartes, who tried to find mathematical foundations transcendent of nature, even and then found its way into the Empiricists, who tried to find unassailable laws within nature. In casting off superstition, religion, custom and habit, prejudice too, peope would become Enlightened. This was the onset of the prejudice against prejudice and the pretense of innocence, though it was far from innocent, and awareness of this only started to pique around the time of the first World War...The major inheritors of The Enlightement tradition are found in scientism which, as I've said, attempts to bypass accountability with decontextualization and a pretext of objectivity, and so called progressive politics.
Up to a point somewhere almost 100 years ago, liberals might have thought quite highly of themselves. Their premises were of the Enlightenment, they saw themselves as smashing through ignorance, change necessarily being good, wreckage a necessary hazard on the way to progress toward foundational truths.[Secret Agent Man - Rivers]
I'd like to digress from our narrative, situating Aryans in Modernity - Postmodernity, to take the hermeneutic circle into the present for a moment, as we do circling from the general to the particular anad talk about a a recent op, hear the appropriate secret agent music in the background... Jew though Freud was, we can employ similar strategy as he used of hyperbole and understatement against our oppressors...We used Freud's strategy of understatement and hyperbole as he did when he was required by the Gestapo to sign a document endorsing the gestapo... after signing, he insisted on adding one line, stating, "I highly recommend the Gestapo"..
We employed this strategy against a Jew pop musician in Belarus... my friend called my attention to her, noting that she was trying to gain prominence and that she was teaming up with a Mulatto man as a side-kick... trying to impose nigger loving Jew values on Belarus...The pair entered themselves in a contest on a popular Belarusian forum... their picture proudly displayed, the Jew woman and her disgusting dreadlocks embracing the disgusting Mulatto nigger...
We entered a reader's comment under their picture... That she was "a perfect example of Hebrew womanhood"... we carefully avoided the pejorative form, Jew, so that the comment could not be dismissed offhand and deleted from the forum as an insult... the context of Belarus is such that there are enough folks who are wise to where Jews are coming from as to get it... and, in the case of younger Belarusians, they begin to get it...So that was an instance of using understatement..
With regard to the Mulatto nigger, we used hyperbole..We entered a statement that, "He was the most handsome Belarusian man I'd ever seen!
This naturally roused the anger of some readers, one of whom commented that the most handsome Belarusian man died a long time ago and was not soon to be reborn..The two went on to finish dead last in the contest and to be removed from the forum, thereby losing their chance to promote their nigger loving Jew values...
Thus, successful op can be reported not only subverting their influence in this case, but sensitized viewers to Jew behavior, Mulatto supremacism and rousing ethno-European loyalty.[Every Hungry Woman - Allman Brothers]
Up to a point somewhere almost 100 years ago, liberals might have have thought quite highly of themselves. Their premises were of the Enlightenment, they saw themselves as smashing through ignorance, change necessarily being good, wreckage a necessary hazard on the way to progress toward foundational truths.Notice that they still like to refer to themseleves as "progressives"
This quest however, has been thwarted by the likes of non-Euclidean geometers, hermeneutics, the German, Martin Heidegger (a Nazi, bless his pointed head, was nevertheless a major exponent), namely that truth could not be made coherent by mere facts, which were underdetermining of the truth, moreover that the facts were more or less fluid as well; while Heidegger proffered historically situated narratives to remedy Cartesian philosophy.. another blow to modernity came from German physicist, Werner Heisenberg, and his uncertainty principle, in which the mere act of examining subatomic particles changed them - suggesting reflexive involvement with the subjects of study and finally there was another German, Brno's Kurt Godel who won the Nobel prize around 1930, for his proof that a theory of any complexity could not be both complete and unambiguous. By the way, it was this which was said to have undone the theory of logical types which we discussed in the last show, although the logical typing of classes and classifying properly used in a metaphoric or hermeneutic sense remains crucial.Despite all evidence to the contrary, so called "progressives'" are still wedded to this notion that they are moving toward a foundation and that the hazards of change are necessary in furtherance of progress to the foundational truth, "out there"
They are still using this metaphor of change as if it is a good of itself, even in Obongo's campaign slogan - I cannot believe it.Apparently they have not learned, are up to their old tricks with this physics metaphor, good for one thing to avoid accountability for the destruction they are causing. -"it was caused, that's just the way it is".
Here you have President Monkey, and the sin qua non of Modernity and its change, toward so called progress, the culmination of the prejudice against prejudice and it's impossible, unbiological and inhuman quest that began with Descartes:Now, when you consider what president monkey is saying against the fact that 44 of the first 51 countries in per-Capita birthrate are Black African and none are European. Tearing walls down, between the races, as he says we must, is evil, as it would lead inexorably to our being overwhelmed as European peoples.
Rene Descarets married a Jew, the corporations and gave birth to this""And thank you to the people of Germany... The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down."
..There's this guy from the CIA and he's creeping around Laural Canyon.... There's this guy from the CIA and he's creeping around "The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down."[Music: Alan Parsons Project - I wouldn't want to be like you]
Now, when you consider what president monkey is saying against the fact that 44 of the first 51 countires in per-Capita birthrate are Black African and none are European. tearing walls down, between the the races, the tribes, those with the most and least, as as he says we must, is evil and it would lead inexorably to our being overwhelmed as European peoples (THUNDER BOLT OCCURS HERE, FOR REAL!)In defense against this we must, for one thing, take Heideggers' hermeneutic turn, the post modern turn and recognize the ultimate validity of our 14 words.
Modernity's quest for change was concomitant with the notion of valuing difference. One was good, if they were untraditional, different, because they were on the way to the foundational truth.This did contain a paradox, to fit into modernity's requirements, one must be different - thus, be different so you can fit in,
Carl Jung drew an important distinction, which Bateson extrapolated, between "pleroma and creatura". Pleroma are matters of physics, forces and impacts, lineal cause and effect and quantity and less interactive. Creatura are matters of biology - most saliently people are matters of biology - dependent upon optimal levels, not maximal levels of need satisfaction - minimal levels and maximal excesses being toxic (note how America's emphasis on great achievement and actualization would do harm to this principle need of humans, what we might call the dark side of actualization)... not only are people dependent upon optimal, not maximal levels, but people are mammals, (part of the reason why I hated The Matrix, they flouted that notion) people are mammals, evolved to care about relationships - in the case of us, our Aryan brethren and families, and we are interactive within the biosystem of our Aryan conspefics and their habitats. With that, Bateson provides some brilliant examples of the danger (thunder for real!) of applying physics metaphores to biological entities:People, being creatures, being of "creatura" can organize experience and think, as such are something like second order cybernetic systems, that is, they learn to learn - thus, if people are used for example, as a lever might be, or a door wedge or cast aside in some popular, maximizing agenda, they might learn to resent it, and if it's a trick people can learn to learn not to trust, as an aside, we say that the Jews are famous for tricks and that is why Aryans have learned to learn and not to trust them..
Anyway, he goes on to discuss the example of his father's dismay, throwing down the newspaper when reading over the Treaty of Versailles' 21 points - overly punishing of Germany. This punishment of the Germans, when they were already down and waving the white flag, would upon the end of WWI, in this theory, create the second order effect of making it doubly hard for the Germans to trust, make them moral puritans so to speak and lead to the overcompensations of Hitler, so disastrous to ethno-Europeans.In important correction to the pathologies, wreckage and paradoxes of modernity, Aryans must employ our Optimal competence and intelligence. Optimal intelligence choose to reconstruct our traditinal Aryan practices, ways and aesthetics and doing so consciously of the alternatives, but by deliberate choice, does so without the pangs of self loathing for the appearance of conformity.
We situate ourselves historically, as Heidegger would advise, in this most fascinating epoch wherein We shall secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.. because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth14, 5 and 68
[Music: Allman Brothers - Black hearted woman]