It was Czar Alexander II's magnanimous act of emancipating the
Russian serfs by his Imperial decree of Feb. 19, 1861, which
greatly influenced the similar movement in the United States. Some
47 million souls in Russia were freed.
Thus the Czar followed every step of the drama with keenest
attention, and when the above plan of the Hidden Hand became known
to him, he, through his ambassadors in Paris and London, informed
France and England that their interference against the North would
be regarded as a declaration of war against Russia.
In 1908, when many more survivors of the Civil War lived than
today, every one of them knew it. The oldest people never failed
to say to me:
None could doubt that the attack of the five powers which landed
troops in Mexico in 1863 would have given the decisive victory to
the Confederacy. The United States would have been disrupted and soon
the South would have been annexed to Mexico and the North to Canada.
The history of the United States was written for the Americans by
the Hidden Hand's hirelings. This explains why this "incident" is
carefully omitted from American history.
The above stupid and base betrayal of Russia by the United States
must be laid entirely at the doors of the Jews in America, led by
Jacob Schiff, who deceived public opinion to such an extent that
the Americans committed the most shameful act in their short history.
By helping Japan, which traitorously attacked unprepared Russia,
who saved the United States in 1863-64 from mortal danger and who
proved her lack of desire to come into the New World when she
absolutely made a gift of the richest Alaska, the Americans
created a veritable Japanese peril ...
The "new south"
Hi Tom, I listened to your recent show on challenging the
south to raise to the occasion... don't hold your breath... Having a job,
which can require me travel 3 to 4 times a year to different parts of the
country, I have a pretty good idea what peoples' mindset is in the
various states.
Having been raised in California and then traveled and lived in
Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee, Alabama, Iowa, Virginia, Montana,
Nevada, Wisconsin, and new Hampshire, I have a very good indication on
the overall feelings of the general public in these states.
When I am out in public or with co-workers I like to sort of probe
people to see what makes them tick... I don't tell them my
politics or my racial beliefs so that it does not color the
responses or opinions from the talking that is done,,, for
example, if I am in a Wal-Mart standing in line, or if I am at a
coffee place waiting for my order to get done, I'll sort of strike
up a little small talk to get peoples overview of how they feel,.,
I don't hit them too hard ,,,,, for example, I'll comment on the
illegal alien situation.. or the IRS,, or maybe a hot button topic
of the times like the trucking situation right now.
You get a lot of different responses. Some people sort of look at
you funny and can't even comment as they are brain dead,,, some
people can comment but don't because I detect they are scared,,
and boy, some people really go off and unload their pent-up
emotions to you like they are your long lost buddy,, man some
people really hate the system right now.
One thing that really-really disappointed me was the south. I
couldn't believe how many redneck-liberals there are there. They
look, act, talk, like good southern boys, but when you see how
they really are, they are nothing but pussies. In all the states I
have lived, they are the most non-white loving sonsabitches around.
You try to bring up some hot issue with them and right off
the bat they are defending the enemy. They drink beer with the
blacks.. The young adults and kids hang around with blacks. The
woman are just RUNNING to blacks to make them feel wanted and
loved, and the older crowd thinks that the baby Jesus wants them
to get on their knees and service blacks.... I literally got sick
to my stomach in my work environment everyday from southern whites falling
over each other to kiss the blacks ass. It was worse than California!
Now obviously, not every person from the south is like this, but,
I can say that the south has the weakest make-up of whites in all
the states I have lived in. I actually get more anti-government,
anti illegal alien, anti non-white dissident feelings from people
here in Yankee Wisconsin. I have even heard and seen more anger
from whites in California for that matter.
I don't know why the lack of intestinal fortitude is common in the
south nowadays. I'll have to investigate it more, but I do know
that, if I had to put my stock in a state to separate or to become
dissident, it would NOT be the south. Maybe we need to call it the
"new south" so as not to disrespect the real men of the Old South.
Ghost Wolf
What is the "certain evidence" that you "see" that there were many
northerners (perhaps millions)!, who expressed any desire
whatsoever to "get rid of the negroes"? While I know a good bit
about the so-called American Colonization Society and the Liberia
project, all of my research tells me that it was mostly a
political front designed to ingratiate politicians with the
average white man. No more than a handful were ever sent to the
Nigerian colony, even fewer to a similar colony in the Caribbean.
Sure, Abraham Lincoln was a "verbal" supporter of the effort, but
he never lifted a finger to actually do something about it. Surely
you recognize the pattern of American politicians saying one thing
while doing something quite different? Lincoln, of course, was the
first grand master of this two-faced style of government. The
evidence for this is in his constant (verbal) praise of the
American Declaration of Independence (secession from Britain) and
his actions (actual, physical) in response to the Southern
Declaration of Independence. If that wasn't talking out of two
sides of his mouth, nothing was.
Check your facts on the importation of negro slaves. You will find
that the trading companies (the shipping companies, the traders,
etc.) were ALL located in the northeast, specifically
Massachusetts and Rhode Island, New York to a lesser extent. This
was the center of American maritime trade. The South had virtually
none, depending on northern, British and European fleets for their
overseas commerce. And I don't doubt that you know something of
the Jews' involvement in the business. While there were certainly
many times more of them in the northeast, I don't deny that they
invested in the South. The South was seen as sort of a backwater
wilderness by northern and Jewish financiers, after all. A sort of
undeveloped province of northern industrialism and commerce. At
least until it developed its own identity, something that just
couldn't be allowed, don't you know.
Your claim that rich Southerners and negroes miscegenated en
masse, or even to a small degree, is unsupportable. Frankly, it
strikes me as an envy of wealth on your part. Northern
abolitionists and war agitators spent many a sum convincing
northerners that Southerners lived a carefree life of comfort,
thereby engendering their jealousy and wrath. Not a new device in
war propaganda. But you still buy it! Geez. Remember, it was the
New Englanders who were so proud of their "progressivism" and
their "enlightenment", combined with the good old Puritan (or
Jewish?) ethic of destroying everything that didn't submit to its
views. Yes, the South only became the "Bible Belt" after it was
conquered. Up to that time it was centered in New England.
The reason that many people who either know or sense that they
live under an anti-white government attach themselves to the
Confederate flag is because common sense (and more historical
knowledge than you possess, apparently) tells them that that flag
is hated by the same people who hate the swaztika and any other
sign of white resistance to Jew mercantilism. I don't blame you
for trying to find some redeeming qualities in your northern
ancestors, but they were clearly the dupes of the 1860s, just as
Americans, stupid and conquered alike, have been as tools of U.S.
"foreign policy" ever since. They wanted an empire, well, they got
it. Or, rather, you and I got it. And it ain't pleasant, is it?
Should those poor farmers and factory workers have resisted? Well,
yes. If Southerners could do it, why couldn't northerners? In a
word, it was because they were the first
loyal-to-the-government-no-matter-what Amerikwans. They were, in
fact, the only people of European extraction who didn't resist.
Do Southerners lament their enslavers? No. Do they deserve to be
lamented? No.
Whites were not screwed by Southern land owners. They were screwed
by the same forces that screwed the Germans, the Japanese, and
every people such idiots have patriotically conquered since. If
you can provide evidence to refute my reply, I'd be eager to
consider it.
In my opinion, expecting some magical uniting of white nations, or
even regions of vast lands like the so-called USA is a fool's
errand. Whites can only be united in a cause, never an empire.
This is because empires are deadly to the white race. Break down
the empires, allow whites to organize locally (under their own
separate governments) and spiritual health will return, followed
by resistance to tyranny. My great-great-grandfather tried to
explain that to your great-great-grandfather, to no avail. The
evidence is now on my side.
I'll end with a couple of conflicting quotations. Decide for
yourself who was on the side of the white man, back then:
PAN
ARYAN
INSURGENT
NATION
.
Disraeli (first Jewish British prime minister, 1852), with typical
Jewish boastfulness, explains in his book "Coningsby" the vast
underground organization of the Rothschilds. It was a trifle, a
joke for them to induce the Turks to organize massacres of the
Christians, and thus provoke Russia. This done, it was easy to
persuade Napoleon III (of France) that he ought to defend the faithful.
"Our two countries should be upon terms of close amity; our
interests are upon all questions the same. It is essential for the
two governments to be on the best terms. Turkey itself seems to be
falling to pieces. England and Russia should come to a perfectly
good understanding and neither should take any step of which the
other is not apprised."
"The union which we desire to found will not be a Franch, English,
Irish or German union, but a Jewish one, a Universal one. Other
peoples and races are divided into nationalities; we alone have no
co-citizens, but exclusively co-religionaries.
The same object which by the Czar was obtained by the stroke of a
pen, required in a Republic an ocean of blood and billions of
treasure. Why? Because the Hidden Hand so desired it. On that same
Feb. 19, 1861, the newly inaugurated Provisional President
Jefferson Davis named his Cabinet.
From: David Myre <davidmyre@hotmail.com>
Subject: KKK.org - for sale
To: pq5hv8q58y2@networksolutionsprivateregistration.com
Cc: don.black@stormfront.org, erich@resistance.com,
webmaster@davidduke.com, tm_metzger@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 7:10 PM
Muds Eat Mexican Food
