WAR INFORMATION NEWS UPDATE
THROW AWAY THE FISHWRAP JEW-WORSHIPPING CORPORAT PAPERS
AND READ A RACIST REVOLUTIONARY DAILY
A production of White Aryan Resistance Box 65 Fallbrook, Ca. 92088
E-mail Address WARMETZGER@AOL.COM
OUR Big Website is at www.resist.com
24hr daily phone update 760-723-8996
Leave your comments. Your comments and questions are transmitted on WAR RADIO.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Dear Terrible Tommy,

Do you see a gradual reverse of the pendulum of Jew control worldwide? Seems that some countries are gradually awakening to the real evil of these people and what they are doing to our formerly White societies. If we could just get Americans to see some of this (and maybe they are now) maybe we could see a real turnaround. I have noticed on mainstream TV that some attitudes seem to be more moderate with possibly a bit more notice of what is really going on with our Jew dominated government and media. Am I just doing some wishful thinking here, or do you see this also? If so, it is due to in part to people like you who have stood tall and not cowered to the pressure. Thanks,

----------------------

TT says:

Yes I see it and if the U.S. was out of the way the rest of the world would stomp the Jews asses back into the deserts of Africa.

****************************

Hi Tom,

I was watching a televised College Sociology lecture, which was given by some inept Negro instructor. The subject was "Race" and he was showing interviews with David Duke and a leader of the "America First" organization. This nigger was trying to prove that race doesn't exist and was telling the class ridiculous things, like that whites are actually just part Mongoloid and the other part Negroid... That was "His" explanation of how the white race came to be. Of course we know that is utter bullshit, but this class made up of two white women, and all of the rest being fat Negro women, were eating it up. It's funny how the only ones in the class who had counterpoints were the white women. All of the Negroes had a look on their face like they were dumbfounded and said nothing the entire time. He was playing clips of the "America first" guy telling about racial differences, then playing a clip of some Jew doctor who is trying to clone flies. This doctor has not been able to clone a "Master race" hybrid fly, so his point was that since he can't, there must be no such thing as "Race". what an evil lying Jew. The funny thing is that the racialist was saying that in order to disprove the compiled scientific facts of authors like Rushton. These Jew doctors are coming up with arguments that have no basis in fact. Two seconds after he made that comment, they played the clip with the Jew doctor spouting his bullshit. It was really funny that this dumb nigger was trying to disprove the racists, but in his editing of the two clips, Ended up proving the racialist to be absolutely right about the Jews trying to confuse whites into race mixing.

I think that we should be able to get these inept teachers out of these colleges. They are lying to people and destroying the racial pride of whites.

******************************

From South Africa

In the latest Pharos Afrikaans-English Groot Woordeboek, there is no mention whatever of the word "kaffer". However, among the words beginning with "ka" is the word "kak", whose English translation is given as "shit". To illustrate how this word is used, the dictionary offers the phrase, "kak of betaal is die wet van die Transvaal", which English speakers are informed means, "pay up and look pleasant". Other entries include "fuck", "moer" "doos" and "poes".

A recent Afrikaans-English Groot Woordeboek by Kritzinger, Schoonees, Cronje and Eksteen, published by Van Schaik, mentions "kaffer" but only as a prefix for botanical names such as "kafferwortel" ("medicinal plant"). Their Verklarende Afrikaanse Woordeboek of the same vintage does give "kafir" but only as a "Skeldnaam v.d. Mohammedane vir nie-Mohammedane, ongelowige". Again "kak" is explained with an abashed clarity. Van Schaik's 1980 Woordeboek gives "kaffer" as "Bantoeman (veral deur stads-Bantoes as skeldnaam beskou)" but has no mention of "kak". In earlier dictionaries, you find bland, accurate explanations of "kaffer" but no words referring to copulation or bowel movements. In novels at the beginning of the century, such as Jock of the Bushveldt, "kaffer" was used as naturally as "Scotsman" or "Boer". The earliest use I have read of it in South Africa comes from Ogilby's Africa, a book written in 1670 by an Englishman, John Ogilby, who had visited "Nether-Ethiopia", as he called the Dutch settlement at Cape Town. He describes the flora and fauna, including sea life: "In Table Bay, and thereabouts, play many Whales, and other great fifhes." Of the human inhabitants, he writes, in a paragraph entitled "They are Unlearned" -All the Kaffers are void of Literature, ftupidly dull and clownifh, and in understanding are more like Beafts than men: but fome by continual converfe with European Merchants, fhew a few fparks or glimmerings of an inclination to more humanity. This sounds very much like Julius Caesar writing about the Britons. However, in the next paragraph, entitled "They are kind and faithful", he observes -In kindnefs and fidelity towards their neighbours, they fhame the Dutch, and all other Europeans, becaufe whatfoever one hath, they willingly and readily impart to others, be it little or much. To modern eyes, Ogilby's comments are shocking. But why? It is quite clear that he has no derogatory intention. On the contrary, his words are gentle. And he is making no argument but simply describing what he believes he is seeing. Of course, he is writing from the prejudices of his age, and this is the point. He shocks us because his prejudices are different from ours. That is all.

The modern Woordeboeke reflect changing prejudices towards lewdness and race. In the last century the words that ordinary people used to describe sex and excretion were considered taboo. Today the taboo words are racial. It is as if society maintains a certain level of prudery but the objects of the prudery change with time. today we are invited to be broadminded, adult and worldly-wise about words like "fuck" and "shit" and to brush aside with condescending disregard the feelings of anyone offended by them. But we must be purse-lipped, spinsterish and scandalized about words like "kaffer" and "nigger" and react with extreme sensitivity and sympathy towards anyone offended by them.

I phoned the publishers of the Pharos dictionary to ask their reasons for these entries and omissions. A courteous and helpful man explained that "race pejorative words have become so contaminated that they could harm race relations" and it had been decided to leave them out. He explained that many Afrikaners had been "previously uptight" about swear words but were now "loosening", and so would be able to face them in print.

This explanation suggests shifting patterns of offence. The new loosened Afrikaner will not be offended by "fuck". (I wonder if Afrikaner women have loosened enough not to be offended by "doos" and "moer"?) But blacks will be offended by the pejorative word "kaffer". And here is the fundamental question in the debate on racial abuse: why is the word pejorative? "Kaffer" (or "kaffir" or "kafir"), as earlier dictionaries explain, comes from an Arabic word meaning "non-Moslem". It is the Moslem equivalent of "gentile". The meaning in Africa changed to "black African". Reading its use in books of the last century, it is clear that this is all it meant. It did not mean "bad black man" or "stupid black man" or "dirty black man" but just "black man". The pejorative sense comes from a long period of white domination of blacks. The leering white bully spoke contemptuously to his cringing black servant as "you bloody kaffir". Thus the word "kaffir" evokes this period of subjugation and humiliation and this why some argue that it should be omitted from the dictionary. This argument does not bear close examination. A dictionary is a record and an explanation of words, in the same way that a history is a record and explanation of events. An entry in either does not imply approval. History books should not omit all mention of apartheid simply because its memory might evoke wounded feelings in blacks who suffered under it.

Consider racial abuse of other people. The most wronged and persecuted people in history are the Jews, and the most commonly used racial insult against them is "Jew", as in "the bloody Jews". Jews have heard this abuse over centuries, in pogroms and concentration camps, but regard the word "Jew" not with shame but with extreme pride. They make no attempt, as some squeamish Christians previously tried, to replace it with "Hebrew", as if it were somehow more genteel. The same is true for "Boer". It is the word other people most commonly use when they try to insult the Afrikaners. But most Afrikaners, especially the nationalist ones, are proud of "Boer". "Kaffer" is different in that the deeper pejorative sense comes not from the white speaker but from the black listener. The same happens to any colloquial word that whites give to blacks. It does not happen the other way round. There is no slang word that whites give to blacks that blacks do not find offensive, and there is no slang word that blacks give to whites that whites do find offensive. "Nigger", "coon", "floppy", "munt", "nig-nog" and "kaffer" all offend blacks. ("Nigger" comes from "black" and "munt" comes from an African word for "man", as does "Bantu".) "Honky" does not offend whites; it just makes them laugh. In Rhodesia, they tried symmetrical nicknames for the races, calling the men from Europe "Euros" and the men from Africa "Afs". The Afs were offended; the Euros did not mind. Blacks seem to care deeply how they are regarded by whites but whites do not care at all how they are regarded by blacks. This points to a lack of confidence among blacks in their own race and a serene confidence among whites in theirs. The premise seems to be that the relationship between white and black is like that between adult and child. Politically correct whites, typified by the Pharos Woordeboek, emphasizes this. White men, even white women, are adult enough to hear the vulgar words of the coarse, real world but blacks are like children and must be protected.

Curiously enough, John Ogilby, writing over three centuries ago, and in other ways so different from the politically correct of today, shares their view of the black man as a child. But the premise is, and always was, entirely wrong. The key to good race relations is for every race to regard every other race as composed of equal, adult, human beings. The patronizing of blacks by politically correct whites today is obnoxious and destructive. The Oxford English Dictionary retains "kaffer" with a correct explanation; the Merriam-Webster Dictionary in the US retains "nigger". Pharos dictionaries should return "kaffer" to their pages and treat blacks as adults.

******************************

Dear TT:

To the Palestinians:

You Stone Age people, are you able to create some shower rooms? When we are ready with Muslims here in Europe (we do not want to gas them, but we will send them back to do their duty in their home country) we will support you when the last sand nigger has left Europe, we will send you our very best gas chamber engineers who build those fun-chambers before 1945. At least the Jews say that there were such people and some of them are still alive. So it must be the truth. This is the rule over here. We will ask those aged super engineers to assist you to build some of those benefits of human kind. If they agree all Muslims will leave Europe to assist them in their precious work. All other Muslims who want to stay in Europe will be of small worth for you and we will burn their houses to the ground. For this job we expect that you will do your duty, not by blowing up a ridiculous number of Jews in North Africa or whatever your territory is by name, - When we have an Aryan government we will support your greed for new land. I say any Muslim still alive in Europe is not a good Muslim. He should go home and support his brothers or we will send him home as ashes by wind and sea.

But I think this breed is not able to play big game. They‘re parasites and just one percent above niggers. Otherwise they would try to build up an own economy in Africa and would not bore us with their presence here in Middle Europe. Sometimes I hate them more than Jews. They can blow up themselves or burn themselves each day. They are only parasites and one day we will gas you in the same chambers as Jews. Do not laugh, you will recognize me one day if you stay here and want to plant your subhuman half-moon over here. Remember my words, we will walk in your blood as the crusaders did before. Leave and fight and we will support you. Stay and I would even march in the sign of the cross to get as much as I can of your ugly kind. This is my Aryan position to sand niggers. Any questions? - right, let us start to tell them that they are not welcome. Enough is enough or are my English comrades still so superior and they still do not smell the odor? Send a gradulation to your tough nostrils, mine are already offended. From Austria