The either/or of Blacks and Jews

Allow operatives to place emphasis on different fronts.

I can agree, appreciate the upgrading and refinement in my understanding of Jews, can go along with their elite being prioritized as enemy number one. However, I cannot and will not agree that "Blacks, even," should not be focused on as an important threat.

Though Blacks and Mulattoes take a different form and means, the danger is real; especially to working men; to us, the imposition of Blacks is profound; I cannot agree to it being put aside as insignificant; in fact, ultimately, it is probably on par with Jews in terms of concern.

Most of us have recognized that it is best to take on one enemy at a time. So, some of us have opted to focus on Blacks - seeing them, their apologists and their advocates as more the menace - after having seen friends become wealthy, having had conversations with Jews, believing that we can take care of them and their exploitations; we have emphasized one side, as people having taken the other priority believe that they can more easily deal with Blacks

One front is certainly better than two. But it's not reality.

Jews and Blacks should not be cast in terms of either/or. Power is not lineal. If Jews are coming from 'the top' and Blacks are coming from 'the bottom', it doesn't mean we can ignore them - even though some may think it is cooler to pay attention only to Jews.

In a strategic approach, rather than either/or, and rather than foolishly ignoring the threat of either, it is best to look upon them as separate fronts; it is good for some to recognize a need to focus more on Jews - but let's not go so far as to say that Blacks are not an important concern - and lose credibility with workers and others who will know that what's being said isn't true enough ("Blacks are not a problem") and that the more fundamental concerns of their well being are not an important issue, as I do not go so far as to say that Jews are not an important concern.

Wolf Europe