With this metaphor, if, for example, Germans are like the cerebral cortex, and very smart when it comes to operations of logic, then they might recognize that the cerebral cortex is trivial without the rest of the brain and body. Perhaps France, for example, is like the gastro-intestinal tract; Belarus is like the liver; and even if one country is like the back, who wants to be without one?

I would hypothesize that the European peoples have co-evolved, and are to some extent interrelated, to some extent protecting each other through feedback, buffering functions and in qualitative niches. For more examples, perhaps Bulgarians are evolved to interface and defend against Turks; Germans are evolved to compete favorably with Jewish intellectual achievements; Italians are evolved to buffer African style and aggression; French are evolved to humiliate the Arab's lack of taste and organicism; The Spanish have evolved a stoic efficiency to match Amer-Indian barbarism; The Scottish need not be intimidated by the rigor of the Chinese and Japs; English creative depth can trump Indian spiritualism. The Irish and the Welsh have the deserved confidence to handle the Pakis and various contingencies, for that matter; Belarusians have evolved enormous strength and guile to handle the Mongol hordes ...

These are necessarily imperfect examples. It is a qualitative matter. The difference between sameness and non-equality marks an important, qualitative difference. I would hypothesize that the ecology of the White American situation has Not benefited by the under-representation of continental Europeans. There has been a demographic carry over to America of England's ancient wars and disdain for French, Spanish, etc; there is a tendency for English to exaggerate their difference from these folks and to minimize the hazard of non-Europeans, Blacks; to shrug them off as too lacking the I.Q. to be a real threat. While, in likelihood, the indigenous peoples of Europe have co-evolved in some symbiotic functions more than that view might recognize.

Life as constant war, another metaphor that one Sunic interviewee has bothered me with, can be over extended. If you look around, you might also see people engaged mostly in cooperative activity.

The VOR sometimes leans toward a pan-Germanic perspective; hence, focusing on the over-arching problem of Jews, while not feeling the destructive interface with Niggers.

When I first criticized Sunic for underestimating the difficulty of the interface with Niggers without the ancient backing of one's European culture, I was not aware that Sunic was so much among a small, recognized elite. I didn't know that he is a friend of MacDonald. And I didn't know that he had some things very right – such as focusing on the liberal motives of ZOG and corporatism as the source of non-White immigration woes – that would fit with Metzger's view of taking it to the top. His calling for the re-establishment of White Cultural hegemony is likely to be on the money as well. The way he deconstructs Marxist language is great. He held up, held the line through undoubtedly horrible times in American academia when less help was available via the Internet. And more. I feel bad that his daughter passed away. Maybe because he is in such an important role, I get angry at things his perspective does not capture. As I've said, I am not in agreement with the VOR thing that niggers are a piece of cake – look at the behavior of women. I'm going to forget and let Jews off the hook for being the mastermind of this mess because I recognize the threat of niggers? I don't think so. I over estimate the threat of niggers? Well, I can hope so.

Hearing Sunic interview a scientist, Dr. Lynn, with his shallow notion that Southern Italians don't do well because of a lower I.Q. lit a fire under me. I doubt that this man has been to southern Italy. Moreover, returning to the analogy above - even if it were all that Italians did, to buffer from Africans, it would be an extremely important function; and it requires a different set of skills from the faint logics of an I.Q. test. It is a qualitative matter. If I.Q. were all-important then Jews would be ok. The difference between sameness and non-equality marks an important, qualitative difference. Indeed, while not foolproof, I have seen Italians doing better than other Europeans in not allowing for Nigger integration. Italians may help to occupy an otherwise intriguing void between German and African aesthetics.

Returning to the issue of the quality of life: look at this southern Italian village again. Does that look like a third world disaster to you? Now, admittedly the southern Italian city of Naples is no pearl, but it did produce Giambattista Vico; the first prominent voice to oppose Descartes, taking the unit of analysis, properly, into interaction. Snob appeal to Searles is not enough, nor to Chomsky, nor Austin - proper social constructionism, which would be free of Jew abuse (99% of it is Jew abused, which is why White activists are turned off by it), has more than adequate responses to these scientists: basically they seek fixed foundational truths, taking the "mind" out of context; trying to isolate variables independently from purpose and joint construction, what operations of thought are doing in contexts. Scientists such as these think that they are drawing maps of the mind; but, as Nietzsche would say, they are really drawing maps of maps. Duke continues to make himself look bad by trying to insist that it is important whether race is socially constructed or not. By the way, it is: nothing exists outside of interaction and how facts count must be negotiated between people; that doesn't mean that race is not real – it is. Again, one might make use of the word, "mere", to distinguish idealism from realism; while making use of the advantages of this way of thinking. Edgar Steele seems to have made some good use of it, for example.

A northern perspective may try to lord itself over southerners all it wants, but the Southern Italian village can be preferable to Milan, the Los Angeles of Italy, any day of the week. They need not be in envy of Northern Europe; no need for the rif raff of Milan; nor French philosophy imposed.

The VOR is sometimes leaning a bit toward pan-Germancism in its discussions of how Europeans ought to bridge their differences. ...I have seen no evidence of Schaenk's remarks about "graffiti and garbage in eastern Europe" and "people hardly different than Blacks" ...

Sunic's discussion of Poland also bothered me. I trust his main point was to emphasize the death and suffering of Germans civilians at the end of WW II. However, if Germany lost cities that they'd developed, Breslau and Danzig, those cities going to back to Poles after the war, for having been ancient Polish territories, so too did Poland lose Vilnius to Lithuania, Grodno to Belarus and L'viv to Ukraine - L'viv, a city which the Poles had built, is as good as Gdansk (Danzig) and Wroclaw (Breslau) combined - and the Poles who had lived there, were moved to Wroclaw. Poznan, where the first three kings of Poland are buried is at the heart of Poland. Hence, let us not instigate the kind of inter-European conflict that Sunic would correctly admonish. Here is a monument in Poznan, where three Polish cryptographers, Zygaliski, Rozycki and Rejewski, from Poznan's Adam Mickiewicz University, cracked "Enigma". Finally, the Germans did rather lay Warsaw to ruin. Nevertheless, it would seem that Hitler had made his mind up to get them Jews come hell or high water – all else was an obstacle. Nobody should want to see Germans harmed in any way or deprived of anything. We all know how pivotal they are to our European survival, how competent they are (while they perhaps make us nervous for their capabilities, at the same time). They need help in dealing with Turks, Jews (yes, we all do) and undue guilt trips. However, I fully agree with Metzger's pan-Aryanism, which would include all indigenous-Europeans.

Americans do not fully appreciate the importance of the discrete states for Europeans. Yes, they are right to not want them to engage in war, but there is another extreme that is ripe for Jew exploitation as well. So, lets not do away with the units of the ship and their facilitation of accountability.

A Polish diplomat commented wryly, "The European Union threatens to do what two world wars could not do."

Belarusians (Krivians), The Welsh, the Scots, The Irish, The Basques, Germans, blond haired, blue eyed Scandinavians, whichever, we should endorse and support separatism and alliance of White separatists.

One of the differences that I have with a perspective that crops up amongst right-wingers is on the matter of Eugenics - as it may ignore these important qualitative differences. When people start to consciously decide what is better and what is unfit, my concern is that conscious selection does not have the wisdom to make that selection appropriately. Genetics have depth. Our entire bodies are ancient and wise. We might prefer that Augustinian devils (natural accident) make the selection – if one can survive the rigors of nature, if one can live to be old amongst reasonable social expectations, then basically one may be good enough. As opposed to Manichean devils (human gamesmanship), which would be largely man made choices, tests and tricks – kind of a Jewish thing, anyway. Where is the dividing line between where a person is too weak or where the society and environment toxic? All can be expected to fight in some way. Those who will not fight the enemy, now those are people whom I would say are unfit. I don't care if someone isn't tall, isn't very muscular, isn't beautiful, doesn't have a 170 I.Q, so long as they'll fight. ...speaking of I.Q., have you ever heard the guy with the world's highest I.Q. talk? I have. He is a theoretical moron. I don't know why that is. Maybe I.Q. only measures a certain, narrow kind of intelligence. I suspect that to be the case. A Kantian type refrain would hold that if a person is not acting in accordance with the interests of Whites, then a high I.Q., good looks, strength and wealth only make them worse. Yes, we want to foster the high I.Q. contingent among Whites, but, if I.Q. was everything that mattered, if that was what it's all about, then Jews would be ok.

I can see positive Eugenecism for Whites, breeding up of some, asking some to breed on behalf of the state, as the Spartans did but ...

Genetics are deep and conscious and deliberate tampering with them is risky business. Trying to quantify a few variables is prone to ignore many important interfaces while removing them from the all-important context of the environment and social relations– context is content. While there is a such thing as having too much compassion, being dragged down by the ugly, the stupid, the deformed, the weak, the fat, there is another extreme..

Who is inspired by a potential nation where only one stud stallion gets to breed? Where there is only one kind of female beauty? Being merely big, for example, is not highly relevant to modern warfare. In White lands with secure borders, you'll find a large percentage of women repulsed by this sort; and father's telling their daughters not to marry them - simply because they are often too narrow, arrogant and selfish; even if they can be incisive and smart in the first place, their perspective is not broad and circumspect enough to account for depth. Fathers in these situations tend to teach their daughters a cultivated turn (culture), reconstructing paradigmatic conservation.

While alphas can survive for a time longer in a nigger friendly environment, what would have been their sustaining environment and resources suffer; what is ecological is qualitative in its fit between organism and environment - one reason why quantification is not always better - it may over graze, as niggers and corporation do.

Can the cerebral cortex be overly given to practical force and not concerned enough for context and pre-figurative issues?

We should not want Europeans imposing upon other Europeans. We wish to preserve the blue eyes and blond hair of the north. But we do not want Italian and Spanish beauties classified as "Hispanics" and thrown to the niggers either. We should not wish for Germany to annex Poland, for Poles to populate Germany and Britain, for The English to ignore the plight of the French for historical grudges; for Russia to envelope Belarus, which it is on the way to doing; eliminating another ancient and important European culture. Some exchange between indigenous Europeans is good and healthy, but there is such a thing as too much.

Ecology calls for a patterning disbursement of White abilities in relation and fit to the environment's capacity, not only a quantifying isolation of the stallion or the nerd.

Niggers have already over-done the masculine thing in their 150,000 years of pre-evolution to indigenous Europeans; that's why they are the way they are, to the point of stupidity, over-grazing, overpopulation and arbitrary destruction. It would be unwise to wiggerishly mimic their selective patterns - or to make them look cool by quantifying the nerd. We are well warranted in pervasive ecology to correct non-White over-population.

Ecological disbursement is a better angle than narrow quantification. I may sound a bit like a social Marxist here; but not really, as I am talking for Whites only, and about qualitative niches, not a false equality. So long as the best of Whites are not hindered from breeding and unhealthy Whites do not truly endanger Whites as a whole (which they can, in jealousy for example, not seeing their part in the White Class of sisters and brothers), I do not see the need for a strong negative Eugenics program.

Besides those incapacitated from the get go, there is only one just way to test who should survive – those who will not actively fight on behalf of Whites and those who will not actively separate from non-Whites – I agree that they can go to hell.

However, even a minimally talented White can bring a lot to the fight. Even an old person can bring a lot to the fight.

It is one thing to obstruct the alphas from breeding, and it is another thing to presume betas are unworthy of breeding. In fact, it is the betas that have a vested interest in the survival of the White Class: they have to have it more than alphas do. Alphas tend to be flipped into liberals by disingenuous female gatekeepers in their next generation of offspring. Their women will tell them that they are strong enough to deal with niggers and the men who cannot do so as easily are mere weaklings. They tend to be as susceptible to treachery as any. That's why we do not necessarily want them as leaders and another reason why we want leaderless resistance.

Do you want to be lead to a place where only one male can have women? Is that a place that you want to go to?

If qualitative disbursement of abilities within the White habitats and Diaspora is afforded, survival likelihood is increased as genetic flexibility and biodiversity allows for more contingencies (natural selection requires a preliminary step of variation); increased too if various qualities are allowed to develop on interface against out-groups; e.g. those who have good defense of niggers, Jews and other non-Whites.

Hence, this is one of my complaints about those who are only about northern Europeans. They are denying the buffering capacities of southern Europeans. This lack of the continent and its buffer may be one of the problems with the U.S. - its largely Germanic/Irish population in interface with a largely Black/Hispanic population is perhaps awkward – if nature abhors a vacuum, perhaps the normal European ecology would have southern Europeans occupying a void, and helping to thwart what might otherwise be intriguing differences: Italians might help occupy an otherwise intriguing void between German and African aesthetics.

The VOR has it right about Jews. But they are often soft on niggers (they would refer to Niggers as Blacks or Africans; terms good enough for your daughter); this softness is dangerous in my judgment; and this perspective (that Blacks are not a worthy concern by comparison to the Jews) is susceptible to the worst women. Blacks are not so bad – well, tell that to the White women who want to hear it, who queue for niggers (in a way that they do not for Jews, by the way) - many of whom are among the most qualitatively differentiated, sucked into the black hole of niggerdom. So the Jews control the overall framework. But to note that niggers are not doing us any favors and that yes, they are an enormous bio-hazard, enormously destructive, is not to be distracted from the Jewish issue. The VOR perspective has too much of that assumption. "We should not have Levantine hatred of out-groups" and we are conforming to an easily ignored stereotype if we show passion to the point of profanity and epithets.

Quantification of one type would tend to cut off certain kinds of intelligence, flexibilities and environmental/contextual interfaces. Thusly, I speculate a kind of imbalance in America – a lack of the continent. I can hear the hard-core British patriots balking at the Frogs and the P.I.G.S. But man, the English deserve their people and land as much as any – of course! And I hate what is happening to England, having always admired the cultures and people of Britain. More, how many compartments can sink without taking the whole ship down? We absolutely cannot wash our hands of England, France and Holland.

I rooted for Spain in the 2010 World Cup Final, and so did everyone else in the European bar from which I watched, seeing as they played with their own men (even if one or two did give me the willies, thick lips and kinky hair), while Holland fielded Mulattoes and Niggers – not that many, but even one would be too many.

The Compartmentalized Ship, The Body and Its Organs, are metaphors that capture the breadth and qualitative requirements of the White kingdom – a systemically interrelated and yet buffering whole.

This metaphor which Metzger uses, The "Compartmentalized Ship" ...to include life boats, no doubt, would allow for the maintenance, the paradigmatic instauration of the various indigenous peoples and nations; to include parts of Russia and parts of The U.S., parts of South America, Australia, etc ...to be looked upon as a complete whole, the ship. At the same time the compartments being homeostatic, self contained, would be air tight, so that if one unit gets flooded with muds, becomes treacherous, the others will be buffered from it, but may help flush out the flooded compartment. This metaphor also allows for those nations/peoples who perform one function better than others to have that quality recognized, valued and protected. More, this metaphor has the added advantage of recognizing European concerns that Americans often tend not to see – for example, Poland does see Poland, all of it, as its historical homeland, which it does not want to be annexed to Germans. Germans do not want to be flooded with Turks ... Southern Italians may defend their lands against northerners, who may think, wrongly, that their northern ways have all the important bases of thinking covered – they do not.

The number crunchers, pointing-out numbers for I.Q., Gross National Product, etc., can exaggerate a few non-qualitative variables. Southern Italy does have its bad spots and aspects, but nothing near so bad as the bad parts of The U.S., France and The U.K.; and it can also be lovely and complete with technological amenity.

Organs of the body, qualitative, ecological disbursement – it's been pointed out that organisms do not necessarily compete; they rather find niches.

This works seamlessly with the ghost wolf strategy of swimming in the sea of the people, disrupting the status quo of ZOG. The ghost wolf is already a separate agent. His or her disruptions are aimed at facilitating and making separatism more desirable.

The separatist alliance applies pervasively. Introducing Niggers and Jews to our habitats and people is like introducing an invasive species or plant that destroys the native species and plants; attacking specific, vital organs. Saying one part of Europe can go to hell is more likely to cut off a valuable, qualitative niche than it is to remove a competitor.

Pervasive Ecology as it extends to people would take the form of Qualitative, Ecological disbursement to fit the niches of particular interactions and environments.

The idea of leaderless resistance emerges more and more a good one. Metzger also advocates the needs for an above and a below ground force. Above ground spokesmen perform the function of orientation more than a function of leadership. Those who are underground, the ghost wolves, are wise. It is not only ZOG and the law that can hurt you, but just ignorant, ordinary people who are brainwashed with Jew think.

Now, while Americans may not realize that there are places in the East of Europe that still merit a largely conservative stance, because they are still mostly White, Metzger's point is well taken that this cannot be the emphasis in the States and in Western Europe, where the underground wolves need to be disrupting and the above ground propaganda wolves need to be agitating.

Paradigmatic Separatism, if it is to be used as a term in alliance and coalition, needs to come across as different from any of the things that Jews have associated to the word conservatism; and it needs to be understood as being a non-passive; it is rather a tool that allows for reconstruction, instauration. For the purposes of RaHoWa, let us view Pervasive Ecology as "The Sword", Paradigmatic Separatism as "The Shield" and The Separatist Alliance as "The Kingdom." Fighting a sheer offensive war is foolish. Of course, for the Ghosts, stealth and surprise provide the Shield. But for the above ground propagandists, separatist alliance is a Shield: White freedom from association with non-Whites; conservative White borders and liberal White individualism – that is what is going to allow for our avoidance of a stereotypical ZOG profiling, not obsequious language. Nevertheless, the objective is the same – a view to the telos, the perfection of our White lands. A shield and a wall: those who dare to transgress will provide a thrill for the opportunity to use of the sword. By now, the opportunities are legion and heavily overdue. Aim high. The Joseph Paul Franklin Award for pervasive ecology awaits: that is not the death penalty; it is the award for inspiration and contribution to the means and legacy of White Women, Men and Children – imagine coming into a world secure in the existence of our people. Our freedom of and from association, our paradigmatic separatism has been transgressed. Paradigmatic separatism is required.