How incommensurability enhances the argument for classification.

Here is a way of illustrating non-equality versus non sameness a difference that makes a difference. In non equality, the logics of meaning and action may be the same. In non sameness, logics of meaning and action are incommensurate and with that comes a more exact reason for the need for classification and discrimination. When the logic of meanig and action of one system does not match but rather interferes with and tangles the logic of meaning and action of another they are called incommensurate logis - by way of example:

In the matter of non-equality - nobody is an equal chess player; but they play the same game - chess. They are engaged in commensurate logics.

Regarding Non-sameness and different logics of meaning an action - Blacks and Jews are playing checkers while Whites are playing chess. They are playing incommensurate games; a difference that makes a big difference

Not only did I want to point out that logics of meaning and action may be incommensurate, but I also felt that it was an important point to make because it underscores that competition, in the case of incommensurability, may be something to avoid altogether; more, as TT and Cobb have pointed out, it could be somebody quite ordinary (or worse) who makes the difference, not necessarily the best chess player - so I wanted to give some encouragement for a wider range of Whites to lend their agency with the notion that they may be of help, whatever their their skills may be, so long as the end game is commensurate with the 14 words.

So, this doesn't fly in the face of what TT is saying, just adds a gear and tightens a bolt down in the ship's engine room.

Whites are taking more steps to the hole, learning more, cultivating resource and amenity along the way, than Blacks are; and Jews are given to be up in the head wind bags,continually misframing every issue to the detriment of Whites.

Wolf Europe