As part of recursive biological systems, people are a part of fairly discreet, reconstructing biological patterns - for prime example, the White race - and while truth and freedom have been proposed as an alternative to the tyranny of patterns, patterns of filial relationship are something to which we must come to terms.
The scientists who seek objectivity are in an interesting position, as they must blind themselves to their own position, to accountability, to their contamination as observers. Rational blindness its called. That's just the way it is, according to the hard matter of physics, forces and impacts, no further explanation necessary. And it seems as if all science suffers from this physics envy. Make me the devil and gravity still doesn't change...but gravity is in the realm of physics, people are biological - remember Carl Jung's distinction between physics and biological metaphors; and Bateson's warning not to apply physics to people who are biological creatures, caring deeply about relationships, from the great dependence of infancy to the ages of maturity. Whose rights? Whose Truth? Whose freedom?
Agentive responsibility, Coherence and Warrant are to be found in that of which Cartesianism wreaks havoc - Accountability.Have you ever found yourself utterly mystified, as you search for some point inside your head where the problem might be, as others ridicule you to look to yourself and not blame others? Not only do you not find this point as you go farther and farther from reality looking for this point among the forms, but if you are really sharp, like William James, you would realize that for this search to be possible, you'd have to be in two place at the same time. Such is the insanity that Cartesianism requires.
Yeah, sure I've got psychological problems. Freud would say so, right? Another Cartesian abstraction - the mind - now that's profanity, the mind; its a four letter word and it shouldn't be used. One might prefer to observe the wisdom of their ancient evolution, and observe the pain of their emotions and the anguish of their ideas as indicating a problem not in their mind, but out there in society, the White man hating society, wouldn’t you?The Cartesian quest is mystifying. Heidegger was talking about that when he said that science doesn't think. Thinking is more like poetry. We survey already existing discursive structures, take and give thanks for that which is most essential. What is most essential and what is most interesting (inter-esse-nce), as he says, is inter, that is, of central value and in between the highly abstract and the highly particular. And it is not lineal process, it is qualitatively meandering process within the life span and broader history; that hermeneutic turn, which always tacks back and forth between the facts and larger narrative frames, provides necessary coherence, agency, warrant and accountability.
Science is not inter esse, it is not the essence.Thus, science cannot be the sine qua non for Whites according to Heidegger. Martin Heidegger was anti-Cartesian. He recommended situating one's self in the narrative perspective of one's historical epoch as a corrective to Cartesianism. Not only that, he coined a special word, called Dasein, or there-being, in corrective to the Cartesian notion of self. In there being, as opposed to looking for one's self in two places at once, or an infinitely regressing point, one would find them self out there, among people, in the environment, in interaction, not in their head - and low and behold, one will become demystified, start to find motivation, causes for them self, as they discover them self in there being.
The there being of accountability is necessary to undo the mystification and arbitrary runaway of Cartesianism. And, although accountability sounds like a negative word, it is actually necessary (Shotter) to the development of an agentive, coherent and warranted individual self. We use these requests for an account to articulate for ourselves ways of situating and making sense of the world. It is through accountability that we come to articulate our own autobiographies for ourselves – and may find more accurate locus of responsibility in accountability of the other individual and class. Self is found in interaction with other people, not in a Cartesian point - almost better to blame corporations, niggers and Jews too much, if that's possible, than to simply cop to the mystification of self blame. More, it may be too painful to blame our women as much as they might seem to deserve when they are young, crazy and not ready to be married. This is not to say that you should give up your independent agent status and seek out cooperation a great deal - one makes big mistakes when they try to cooperate with ordinary everyday people too much - I guess seeking out cooperation too much causes context and interface change, unforeseen consequences. Rather, rely on your own experience in combination with the opinions of the best who are on your side. Be that as it may, taking sufficient account where you may, you are able to establish coherence, to negotiate complexities and contradiction and establish agency. However, just as it requires the other to request an account of oneself, it also requires the hypothesis of a class.Regarding scientific pursuit I'd like to mention again the advice of Whitehead, when he said that we cannot continually investigate everything but must be able to rest content taking certain things for granted. We must always proceed from a given state of partial knowledge. We use working hypotheses; and even false or inadequate working hypotheses are better than no working hypotheses. In other words, we use pre-existent, prejudicial, if you will, structures – Classifications. As such, we are accountable to others of our class and we hold people outside, of other classes accountable - we are not simply open minded. We classify our White folk, the patterns of Black and Jewish people and behavior, corporatists, on the higher logical type as they are operationally verifiable; we as Whites discriminate against them as a class, and are assertably warranted in prejudice against individuals – the lower logical type - of those, and other non-indigenous European classes, as an overall classificatory discrimination.
Bearing in mind that while the likes Gödel and Heisenberg proved that Whitehead's logical types - that is, proved that a class being incapable of being a member of itself - could not really function as a closed system, that systems are not closed, but patterned, reflexively interactive, recursive systems - can be looked upon as another loophole for Jews to exploit - and would - right wing reaction to that proof, and going for a pure, ultra scientifically based society to defend ourselves against Jewish argumentation would be mistaken. Gödel and Heisenberg moved us beyond foundational science and into interactivity, into an open endedness which increases our agency and meaning as a people, our possibilities, our defense in account and holding to account - realize that Einstein would walk to the Institute of Advanced Studies at Princeton just to be able to talk with Gödel. Rather than going backwards into good old fashioned science, we should see the opportunity in taking the post modern turn as Heidegger would recommend, augment science with hermeneutic, narrative agency and accountability in defense of our people - in fact we must.The Christian-Cartesian prejudice against prejudice and classification, the White classification, is invalid: it is void of accountability and in its pretense of innocence, it is not just killing White women and men, but leading to their extinction.
To recap, Cartesianism has wrought havoc with accountability and when it is said that racism is wrong it is being said that classification is wrong while indeed, people need to classify, in order to manage systems of accountability and pervasive ecology.And, in regard to a step which would take even father measures to secure the existence of our people:
Aristotle talked in terms of three categories: The hard sciences, what he called theoria or epistemology; the arts, which he called poesis; and the social sciences, which he called praxis. A hermeneuticist would move amongst these categories, paying particular attention to the realm which Aristotle called praxis - which called for a little more feel, phronesis he called it, practical judgment, as the social realm's complexities are a bit difficult for hard science. And, some would virtually take all now into the realm of Praxis. There is utility in this politicizing, like a leftist, matters of science included, yes; but this is done for the purpose of letting us see agentive possibilities and aspects beyond cause and effect determinism. I don't deny borrowing some of what are considered leftist ideas, by denying episteme, and moving it into praxis; that is availing matters to people's use, White people's use, regarding even hard, scientific ideas - the most important matter becomes how White people say that they count - that's done for our advantage - mere science otherwise can be for or against us,If scientists are disingenuously declaring global warming (and others good, have disproved it, we don't want a penny to go to niggers and other muds; not that we need pollution, either), but if scientists are disingenuously declaring global warming; if they talk in terms of immigration flows as causative phenomenon; that race is a trivial matter of skin tone and only a few small genetic markers, then social constructionism allows us agency and hermeneutics new frames - to defend ourselves! Don't you see? A tree falling in the woods may make a noise, but if there are no White people left in the world to hear, it may as well not make a noise - doesn't really matter. Thus, social constructionism takes Aristotle's categories of episteme, praxis and poesis and puts all into the realm of praxis; it allows our White people agency and accountability - and to hold others to account - to defend ourselves and warrant our actions - those are good reasons - as there is no transcending of interaction and how facts count must be negotiated between people, lets set the deal on behalf of the White Race.
The moral order of the 14 words, the classification of the European race and its various indigenous-groups is what we need, far more than a metaphor of alchemy. Yes, the federal government needs to devolve - but secession of states on political grounds may not be do-able. Hopefully, Metzger will talk more about secession and freedom of association.While Joe the plumber may derive some information from the ivory towers, great revolutionaries have been know to come from the working class. Lech Walesa was an electrician in the ship yards and union leader who spearheaded the overturn of Jew communism in Poland. And those intellectuals who scoffed at his bad Polish and put snobs back into esteem are now witnessing the re-emergence of Jewish power in Poland. Brilliant and excellent as the work of Bowery and MacDonald is, ardent as the alpha male military leader that Giles would call forth to act upon his oath to defend the Constitution may be, sometimes these kinds are cultivating the fodder of agile genius, a Metzger type. We'd best not see the vilification of this type, the kind doing the most brave and courageous work, not garbing rhetoric in the pseudo innocence of abstractions, including terms such as strict legality.
We aren't looking for people who will defend the constitution or science, we are looking for White people who will defend White people and their sovereign states.We can and must do better than the U.S Constitution, its Cartesianism; in fact, even Gödel, in his naturalization ceremony, sited loopholes in The Constitution that would allow for its exploitation by despots. As Tom Metzger and Patrick Henry say, The Articles of Confederation, we work with them.
Wolf Europe