The Way Ahead


The right people for the Vanguard for victory, it has previously been stressed, have to be people capable of an all-embracing, holistic contemplation and comprehension of life, taking account of all aspects of decay and disintegration in interaction. Nothing less complete can suffice. The attainment of this breadth and depth of insight carries with it the realization that we are faced with an all-pervasive, spiritual sickness which is the heart of the trouble, so that tackling it is the heart of the remedy. Thereby we are unavoidably brought to grips with religion.

Conventional nationalist and National-Socialist organizations, even if they do not avow Christianity, the nominally predominant religion of the White people, and evangelize for it, claim a marked merit in avoiding the subject of religion, saying that they are simply and purely concerned with "politics", which for them definitively excludes spiritual matters and thus the mainspring of life. To depart from this exclusion, they say, is disastrously divisive, so they proclaim the subject out-of-bounds, leaving religion to the individual's choice. In so doing they implicitly, if not explicitly, declare themselves to be certainly not in conflict with Christianity, whether this is from personal conviction of its value or only because of the dictates of expediency.

Since religion, Christianity specifically, is already evident in its influence throughout the entire picture of life, as one might expect of such a naturally pervasive force, the declaration of exclusion is only one-sided in effect, incapacitating those concerned from dealing with a present and dominant element in the situation. It is thus a disabling illusion comparable to that of "unity" by dissimilar amalgamation, dealt with earlier on. Consequently and similarly it reflects not some vital wisdom in the emergency confronting the Aryan Folk, but a disqualifying inadequacy.


Perceptive observation of the cosmos reveals the universal interplay of cause and effect, and with response to factors of balance and compensation; all this flux operating as an everlasting process of selection whereby the fitter forms of both animation and inanimation survive and prosper through a state of constant conflict. Nature's aim thus revealed is not some static equality, embodying some enervating pity for the weak, defective and inferior. Instead it is a remorseless preference for the success of the superior.

For human beings the driving urge, reflective of the whole process of Nature, has to be, firstly, survival, but not that alone. Through that and beyond that it has to be a continuation upwards, towards the sun of excellence, and thereby the attainment of superhumanity.

Now how far does Christianity, the White world's purported spiritual staff of life, conform to or contradict Nature's purpose: the struggle for survival and superiority? How far does it measure up as the energizing force for the revival and advancement of the Aryan Folk, being the breed which has so far most excelled in the course of mankind, and shown the greatest capacity for evolution to superman?

Before proceeding to examine these crucial questions -- and, as will transpire, to a condemnation of Christianity as completely failing against these criteria -- the writer is concerned to put on record that he is keenly mindful of the many, otherwise commendable people who sincerely and deeply believe in Christianity and its power to put things right. Most of all he is sorry to have to conflict with those who somehow manage, beyond his understanding, to reconcile National-Socialism and Christianity to their satisfaction. Yet, overriding all resultant hesitation, he believes the primacy of the issue and the exigency of the times requires him to speak his mind.


Christianity's supposed creator was one in a succession of Jewish christs or prophets and preachers perambulating Palestine two thousand and more years ago, and forming sects. As to who he was and what he did and said, we are dependent on accounts composed long after his reputed time, which no reputable court of law would accept as reliable evidence. At the best the material is the outcome of a long succession of hearsay with all the inherent and cumulative disposition to distortion that this entails, and at worst deliberate embellishment or even complete fabrication. Take your choice!

The first part of Christianity's eventually constructed bible, incorporated as being its Jewish background, is the Old Testament. This is a tedious and nauseating collection of tribal tales, transmitted from storyteller to storyteller down through the ages, gathering fanciful and figurative additions all along the way. It supposedly chronicles the doings of the Jews from the beginning of the world, but can hardly be relied on as anything remotely close to true history. What it does present beyond dispute throughout its narrations, thereby perhaps providing their prime justification, is the pivotal claim that the Jews have been selected by their tribal god, Jehovah, as a superior people, a real Herrenvolk of Chosen Ones, entitled and destined to rule the world. In it this Jewish Jehovah -- supposedly the father of the Jesus Christ presented to us in the bible's second testament as "Our Saviour" is seen as a vicious and vindictive, bloodthirsty tyrant without mercy for the youngest and most innocent of babes.

Far from this Old Testament being of the slightest spiritual benefit to Aryans, it is absolutely appalling that for centuries since the Christian Conquest the followers of the son of the Jehovah of the Jews have steeped themselves in this repulsive conglomeration, relying on it as the truth of the origin of the universe and the emergence of man, and inflicting on their children Jewish forenames in token of their servitude.

The beginning of rejection of Jewish ascendancy in the Aryan lands of the world lies in the complete rejection and exclusion of their Old Testament, which inspires and justifies it as a matter of divine selection. Embracing and venerating this Old Testament, Christians thereby accept this divine selection, and are therefore unavoidably brought to accept Jewish ascendancy in the world. Here we have the stranglehold exerted through Christianity's incorporation of the Old Testament, which is so greatly contributory to the success of Jewish ambition.

The second part of Christianity' bible, the New Testament, is an assortment of material from a variety of sources which was finally put together long after the alleged life of the alleged Jesus. The core of its testimony concerning this "Son of God" is contained in its four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, and the Epistles of Paul. Various biblical authorities date the Gospels to different periods within the span of approximately 70 to 150 A.D., and the Epistles to around 20 years earlier than the first of these dates.

The Gospels, which are presented as eyewitness accounts of the ostensible creator of Christianity and the creed he is supposed to have proclaimed, disagree substantially with one another and also with the Epistles of Paul who only met Jesus in an alleged vision. Furthermore, while Matthew's account is supposed to have come first in time, it is largely based on that of Mark, traditionally held to be the second in time, while it is generally conceded that the fourth account has probably been credited to John erroneously. What emerges in the New Testament from all the blending from a variety of sources is a composite figure of a Jesus Christ invested with composite ideas and associated with composite events.


Paul of the Epistles was an early example of the popular Jewish practice of name-changing. This is a form of false pretences indulged in by the Jews to facilitate their dealings with non-Jews in the course of their implementation of their divine selection for supremacy by disguising their identity as Chosen Ones. Born Saul of Tarsus, he is supposed to have been a later convert, not a contemporary disciple. Whether the Epistles attributed to him were genuinely his, or whether they were forgeries of a later date in part or whole, Paul has emerged as Christianity's chief authority for the creed of its Jesus, playing such a key role as for practical purposes to make him more the founder of Christianity than Christ.

Alfred Rosenberg, ideologist of the German National-Socialist Weltanschauung, put it this way: "The Christian movement, disrupting old forms, seemed to the Pharisee Saul to hold great promise of practical usefulness ... In spite of all subsequent attempts at reform, his teachings still remain the Jewish spiritual basis, the Talmudic-Oriental aspect of both the Catholic and the Lutheran churches." ("The Myth of the Twentieth Century", Noontide Press, U.S.A.; English edition, 1982, p. 35.) In departure from the Jewish doctrinal authority, "The Talmud", with its vicious race hatred of the Gentiles -- terming them "cattle" and accusing them of sexual intercourse with other cattle (see its tractate "Abodah Zarah" 22a and 22b) -- Paul, cast as "The Apostle to the Gentiles", purveys to the Gentiles what amounts to an export version of Judaism distilled in a refinery of allegorical, Gnostic syncretism.

This distillation has been a stupendous success in stupefying the Gentile mind, enfeebling the Gentile spirit, and thereby facilitating the ultimate ascendancy of judaism's Chosen Ones. The extent of the spiritual capture and enslavement of the Gentiles by means of the synthetic nectar called Christianity has been such that the contemporary Jew Paul Oestreicher -- who adopted Christianity like our earlier Paul, and so much so that he became a vicar -- has been able to say with certitude: "Was not every Christian, every follower of Jesus of Nazareth, spiritually a Jew by adoption?"


This interpretation of Christianity as a Jewish product for the Gentiles was amplified with boastful candour by the Jewish author, Marcus Eli Ravage, in articles which appeared in 1928 in the January and February issues of The Century Magazine in the U.S.A. from which the following extracts are taken:

"Nineteen hundred years ago you were an innocent, carefree, pagan race. —Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone. But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without armies, without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda."

"Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code. —Our legends and our folk tales are the sacred lore which you croon to your infants. —Our national literature is your Holy Bible. —Jewish artisans and Jewish fishermen are your teachers and your saints. —A Jewish maiden is your ideal of motherhood and womanhood. A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship. —Nearly two thousand years ago, in far-off Palestine, our religion had fallen into decay and materialism. —Then a young patriot-idealist arose and went about the land calling for a revival of faith. —This brought him into conflict with the established order and its supporting pillars. The Roman authorities who were in occupation of the country, fearing his revolutionary agitation as a political effort to oust them, arrested him, tried him and condemned him to death by crucifixion, a common form of execution at that time."

Osiris of Egypt underwent resurrection annually, mirroring the solar year. Dionysus of Greece (identified with Bacchus of the Romans) experienced resurrection. Adonis of Greece was likewise resurrected. The notion of a "Last Supper" came from Persian Mithraism. The idea behind the Christian Eucharist -- namely the partaking of sacramental bread and wine as an act of transubstantiation whereby the body and blood of Christ is consumed -- was widely prevalent long before Christianity. It occurred in Persian Mithraism and in the worship of Attis of Phrygia. The practice would appear to connect with such very ancient and widespread customs as the eating of new corn as embodying the Corn Spirit. As for the nimbus or halo of Christianity, this was yet another adoption from elsewhere. All of the long-preceding sun-gods had this appropriate feature.

In an extension of this wholesale pilfering of beliefs, Christianity systematically appropriated pagan festivals and locations in order to facilitate its imposition. For instance, the winter solstice festival -- yule to the ancient Germanic peoples -- was turned into Christmas with December 25 as the putative date of the birthday of Jesus Christ in the absence of any precise knowledge of the actual date. The pagan festival of spring rebirth, named after the fertility goddess Ostara, and symbolized by Easter eggs, was similarly taken over to become the Christian festival of Christ's resurrection. The old heathen festival of the dead was made into that of "All Souls". Churches were deliberately built on pagan sacred sites in the great and baleful misappropriation which was the coming of Christianity.


Steeped in plagiary and misappropriation from its inception, the predatory religion which has purported to be the world's greatest repository of virtue lost no time in beginning to establish its conspicuously black record of suppression and slaughter, exploitation and corruption which it has continued down through the centuries to the present, and which has included numerous real holocausts. An early achievement in its constant campaign of obscurantist repression was a gigantic burning of books in 415 A.D.

The great library at Alexandra in Egypt contained no less than 900,000 handwritten scrolls, a fabulous accumulation of ancient records. Christian Archbishop Cyril of Alexandra in all his zeal to eradicate anything and everything of pagan significance competitive to the new faith managed, in a spectacular display of bringing light to the world by means of fire, to destroy this whole treasure house in but one day. The banning and burning went on and on. Nicholas Copernicus in 1543 published his findings that the earth revolved round the sun. The Catholic Church banned them for centuries. In 1559 Pope Paul IV even produced an Index of forbidden books as a guide for further book burning.

In 1572, in a brilliant display of the perpetual brotherly love between rival bands of Christians, Catholics in France slaughtered some 70,000 Huguenots (Protestants); while in the Thirty Years War between 1618 and 1648 the same Christian ardour succeeded in reducing the population of Germany from 30 to 7 million. Giordano Bruno, the Italian philosopher, was treated on earth to a preview of the Christian fires of hell by being roasted to death at the stake for holding disapproved views. Sir Francis Galton, the English scientist, in his "Hereditary Genius" estimated that between 1471 and 1781 the Catholic Inquisition burnt 32,000 alleged "heretics" and imprisoned or otherwise punished 291,000 people.

In the Protestant lands fire was equally an instrument of faith. Persons alleged to be witches, meaning practising pagans, were, commonly and enthusiastically burned alive by those inflamed with Christianity. Killing and maiming and material destruction condoned, if not positively inspired by Christianity, has gone on up to the present day. In Northern Ireland and even in the most recent decades we have had the appalling sectarian violence wherein Aryan has zealously and diabolically murdered and mutilated Aryan over Christianity. Alongside the fratricidal Christian conflict within the countries we have had all the inter-Aryan wars between one Christian country and another with the clergy on both sides earnestly blessing the slaughter and destruction. Thus has Christianity proved to be a gigantically divisive and destructive anti-Aryan force resulting in tremendous Aryan bloodshed, catastrophically weakening to our racial resources.

Alongside this vast damage from bloodstained conflict in its name or for the niceties of its creed, Christianity has added a further vast damage from chronic corruption. Avarice and aggrandizement have continually been the practice among its privileged priesthood, while piously preaching contentment with penury for its spellbound masses. Lands and treasure have been amassed by any and every means. Pocket money in plenty has come from a handy trade in fake relics of saints and like trumpery. Far greater gain has been derived from the big business of "indulgences", the purification of sins for a price. For example, Pope Boniface VIII was a real entrepreneur in the business. He invented "The Holy Year" , and the first one in the series worked so well as a sales promotion that the "indulgences" sold during it brought in 15 million golden gulden from the fools of the faithful. This was no haphazard extortion racket: the embodiment of Christ's voice on earth had things properly organized with a full tariff covering the whole range of crimes for which remission could be obtained at a fixed price. And there was much more to the money-making than just this.

To a substantial extent organized Christianity has thus functioned as a facade of altruism and supernatural sanction to fool the people at large so as to permit their rank exploitation by the ecclesiastical wielders of spiritual power. Alfred Rosenberg's comment was this: "The very worst despots of the earth have not been more greedy than representatives of the man whose kingdom is not of this world." ("The Myth of the Twentieth Century", Noontide Press English edition, p.98.)


What is the content of this creed of Christianity which has conquered the Aryan Folk? The doctrine is a synthesized conglomeration of ideas from earlier religions and philosophies. It drew on Orphism, the mystic religion of Ancient Greece, and the Stoic school of philosophy of that land and time; and the ancient religions of Egypt, Babylonia and Persia.

In combination with that, it prominently embraced material from the religious system of Manichaeism, founded by Mani in Mesopotamia, which posited an absolute dichotomy between the good of the spirit and the bad of the body as a form of matter, a dualism separating the visible world or Nature, which is eternally evil, from the realm of the soul, which is divine. According to this creed, man's body is a prison for the soul, and release and redemption is only to be found in death.

In keeping with this outlook of rejection of life, sex -- as productive of life -- was condemned, and celibacy extolled. The influence of this Manichaeism is most clearly, powerfully and malignantly evident in Christianity, being most noticeably absorbed and propagated by the early Christian sect known as the Gnostics who viewed all Nature as corrupt and foul, procreation as a matter of more sparks of the spirit being trapped in a world of rottenness and tears; and faith, not knowledge, as leading to god and liberation.

It is against this background that we can put in place the pronouncements of Paul, the "Apostle of the Gentiles", the first great Christian missionary and theologian. This paramount propagandist proclaimed all human urges to be sinful, and the world of Nature to belong to Satan. To quote him: "For I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, there dwelleth no good thing." (Romans VII:18.) In the context of this anti-Nature, anti-life outlook from the East, all the gloomy sexual prudery of Christianity, as essential expression of its theme of self-renunciation, becomes thoroughly understandable, and in contrast to the shameless joyfulness of flesh and spirit in unison of experience expressed in the pagan pro-Nature, pro-life outlook suited to Aryan welfare.

With his life-rejective material from Manichaeism, Paul certainly did a good job of incubating the bacillus for a disease of the spirit to debilitate eventually to the state of cattle the Aryan peoples of the world.


The Christianized Jehovah is presented to us as an anthropomorphic male who created our world at a particular moment in time who is not only omniscient and omnipotent but also benevolent. This last characteristic utterly conflicts with the never-ending, everyday experience of the most innocent of children and the most worthy of adults suffering hideously and being killed prematurely through no fault of their own, while vile wrongdoers live on and prosper. This pretence of benevolence is furthermore flatly contradicted by the Christian dogma of original sin, derived from the Manichaen and Gnostic dualism just examined, whereby every newborn babe is seen as entering this world with the stigma of inherent wickedness.

Exponents and defenders of Christianity, when cornered with this conundrum regarding benevolence, try to escape by means of the excuse that we mere mortals cannot expect to understand the ways of the Almighty. Well, if this deity is beyond our comprehension, it is curious that his upholders are so readily able to proclaim their certain knowledge of his existence, his superlative qualities, and his wonderful provision of a beatific life after death for us, if we behave ourselves according to his dictates.

Christians are enjoined to get down on their knees -- an abasement as typical as the parsonical whine resorted to by the clergy in their accompanying supplications -- and pray to this unfathomable deity as though, despite his omniscience, he needs to be told our thoughts. They are led to believe that through this ritual he is accessible to personal requests of all kinds, or so believe those like the vicar in the north of England who, in a radio interview a while ago, after describing himself as an ardent fan of his local football team, confided that he always prays that his team will win. Just imagine this anthropomorphic arbiter in the clouds besieged at his telepathic telephone exchange by all the conflicting calls for a win made by all the similarly pious football fans on both sides of each and every game! In the same realm of absurdity you can reasonably presume that there are Christians in plenty in the U.K. praying at this moment for success in the National Lottery.


What is the actual message Jehovah's son Jesus is supposed to have brought with him and communicated to mankind on his miraculous visit to earth, and on which basis has been founded the creed which has conquered the Aryans? Characteristic of it, decisively and summarily, are the following sentiments he is supposed to have expressed in his Sermon on the Mount as contained in the Gospel attributed to Matthew:

"Blessed are the poor in spirit: for their's is the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew V:3.) "Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth." (Matthew V:5.) "But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also." (Matthew V:39.) "But I say unto you. Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you and persecute you." (Matthew V:44.)

It is not honour or courage, or competitive and industrious effort and achievement, which are upheld here or elsewhere for the Aryans and other Gentiles. Whereas the Jews in their "Talmud" and "Torah" are enjoined to outwit and deceive and exploit and dominate non-Jews, the non-Jews are enjoined in the New Testament to be humble and self-renunciatory, and not to face up to and fight enemies seeking to overthrow them. What really counts, the Christians are told, is not striving to live to the full in this life on this earth, but pursuing detachment from worldly things, focussing attention on death and its blessed release to the hereafter where, if deserving, they will be rewarded by becoming eternal wraiths in some heaven beyond the clouds, and, if undeserving, will deep-fry in hell for evermore.

Who can find in the above message of submission the makings of a fighting creed for Aryan survival and advancement, and thus see in the messenger a " saviour" for us in this life struggle? Appropriate to this abject creed of submission, its symbol is no warrior's sword but a cross of sacrificial crucifixion. Equally appropriately its believers are told "The Lord is thy shepherd", casting them in the role of docile sheep. Thus we have here in essence a doctrine for our downfall through self-induced debility of mind and spirit.


In earlier times the Aryans survived and prospered not because of Christianity, but despite it: not through any strict conformity to its enfeebling doctrine, but through general departure from it, practising the semblance but ignoring the substance. In awful aberration, they even opposed, curbed and assailed the progenitors of their religion, the Jews. Things have now much changed. Nowadays the creed has been developed to express all the inherent implications of its essence as contained in such pronouncements attributed to its Jesus Christ as the sections of his Sermon on the Mount just quoted; and with insistence on the implementation of all those implications.

Christianity has, in other words, now come to full flowering fruition. In the forefront today of the forces working for our racial downfall, at least in effect, if not also in intention -- and it makes no practical difference which -- are the priests and promoters of the Christian religion, and there is no gainsaying or excusing this fact. Everywhere they are to be found engaged in anti-Aryan activity as the enactment of their creed.

Championship of Coloured immigration into Britain, enthusiasm for racial integration here and everywhere else, joyful patronage of miscegenation, denunciation of racial feeling, agitation for more and more overseas aid for Coloureds: any and every aspect of racial jeopardy to our Aryan Folk, you name it, and the gentleman of the cross are there, making it the crusading sign of Aryan racial ruin.

A declaration of war on racial patriotism came from England's Archbishop of Canterbury on 17 September 1993 in the words "Every human being is equally precious in the sight of God. Christian people should condemn and resist racism by all lawful means." In other words, you just cannot want to keep Britain a White man's country, if you are a Christian. Instead, you have to be in favour of and work for a multiracial and eventually mongrelized Britain in a race-mixed world.

America's globe-trotting, Christian revivalist preacher, Billy Graham, has voiced the same, anti-Aryan, Christian objective: "Integration is the only solution. We've got to be totally integrated -- in our homes, in our worship services, even in marriage." (Sun News U.S.A., 2 November 1994.)


The harmfulness today of the Christianity of its leaders, with their frontally developed insistence on its fundamental principle that all human beings are equally precious in the sight of its "Lord", lies not only in that form of egalitarianism which rejects differentiation between races, and instead promotes race mixture; it lies also in that other form of egalitarianism which rejects evaluation within the race, and instead opposes any and all eugenical proposals for the betterment of the breed.

For ardent Christians such use of intelligence in the direction of procreation is horrific, an intolerance usurpation of the authority of their awesome Jehovah. To them it is as though, contrary to their own premise as to man's creation and endowment, this colour-blind and quality-blind ruler did not grant them intelligence in the first place with which to procreate wisely instead of copulating blindly.

With the same leave-it-to-god illogicality, those same, ardent Christians passionately and tyrannically oppose any benign measure of euthanasia, not merely for themselves but also for everyone else not agreeing with them. Consequently, for example, in Boise, Idaho, U.S.A., they have fought to keep alive, permanently on a respirator in the St. Luke's Regional Medical Centre, a child born with 85% of its brain missing, and thus on the presumption that dear old Jehovah intended it this way, short-supplying the child with only 15% of a brain while nevertheless endowing others with the full cerebral capacity whereby to invent and operate the respirator, unless it is that the latter accomplishment is to be seen as usurpation of his authority also, in any and all its application. Whatever the interpretation, it looks as though Jehovah saw fit to invest the child with an extra large dose of original sin in place of the ability to do anything redemptive about it, which only goes to show how right the Christians are in declaring that their deity moves in mysterious ways.

These followers of Jehovah and his alleged male offspring fiercely seek to deny terminally ill people a merciful escape from degradation and prolonged suffering on the same self-contradictory reasoning that only the deity can sanction and bring about an ending of a misery which in all his benevolence he must have been responsible for in the first place: a line of argument which by extension would support the contention that all medical knowledge and practice should be eschewed as interference with god's will. As against this pernicious mental warp of Christianity, it may well be argued that, subject to due safeguards against abuse at the hands of and to the benefit of others, it should be everyone's right in a truly free society to secure, if and when desired by lasting decision, a painless exit from this present life in the flux of Nature.

While so habitually intolerant in the above respects, our ardent Christians have a far different attitude with regard to homosexuals, vicious criminals, drug addicts and carriers of AIDS, the disease of such addicts and queers. Here their passionate plea is all for understanding and tolerance.


Christianity's harmfulness today extends far beyond just the agitations of its contemporary leaders and the attitude of its churchgoing flock or even all professed Christians. In its modern development and promotion of poisonous principles present from the start, Christianity has vaporized from the pulpit to percolate everywhere, permeating the whole atmosphere of society, providing the moral and metaphysical underlay for the generality of thought and action in the Democracies of the White peoples. At the bottom of and behind and throughout the whole drift and drive to Aryan downfall in all its aspects, being the biggest single and most fundamental reason for it, the spirit and notions of Christianity amount to the Zeitgeist of this oncoming Age of Aryan Ruin.

With it's emergent emphasis on equality, racial mixture, environmental instead of hereditary factors, and its espousal of virtually all other Leftist concerns, Christianity today demonstrates its affinity with Communism. Just as Communism has seemingly and nominally withdrawn precisely because it is being absorbed and better advanced within Democracy, as the successive vehicle for its purposes, so too its counterpart, Christianity, may deceptively appear to be on the wane in Aryan countries because of reduced church attendance, whereas in reality -- and with all the benefit of the mind-moulding media of television (Judahvision) for the diffusion of the Zeitgeist its fruition has in fact now arrived in the ascendancy of its social and political influence under Democracy at the conclusion of the present century. As in this way providing the spiritual inspiration for the fast-succeeding cause of the Untermenschen against superhumanity, Christianity carries on where Communism, in metamorphosing politically into Democracy, left off.

Thus, under Democracy today Christianity, Communism and Capitalism all coalesce as the distinguishing feature of the dawning new age at the turn of the century.

His society imbued with the Christian ethos, worldwide the White man is on the run, heading by way of decline and surrender to submergence and extinction. The sickness of the spirit, which is Christianity in its maturity, explains the White surrender in Rhodesia some years ago, and the White surrender in South Africa just recently.

In South Africa, beyond whatever sustenance for apartheid the Afrikaners derived from the Old Testament's admonishments for Jewish segregation -- which may well have had much to do with the power allowed to the Jews there, and the close ties between that country and Israel -- ultimately the overriding message of the New Testament for the Gentiles transcended and triumphed, sapping and overcoming their will to preserve their supremacy. The A.W.B. organization there has indulged in a lot of gun-waving battle-talk, but South African White resistance to Black take over has been vitiated and etiolated through saturation in the precepts of contemporary Christianity.

In Britain today the same spiritual sickness permeating the public at large, regardless of whether individuals go to church or not, or declare themselves Christian or not -- is the prime reason for the ghastly situation here. The Christian ethos is the basic explanation why a once great, fighting people, valiant and victorious in war after war, has now succumbed to a peacetime invasion by vast numbers of every kind of racial alien; not only allowed them in but, figuratively speaking, got off the pavement into the gutter to make way for them, lavishing their resources on accommodating them, lauding them as carriers of culture, contriving advantages for them over their own folk, restyling their language so as not to offend them, gaoling their own people if they speak out too strongly against them, and so on.

Exactly the same spiritual climate is responsible for the degeneration taking over our youth, the jeopardy of our elderly from the soft treatment of crime, the symptomatic ugliness of modern art, architecture and music: the whole vortex of decadence.


Christianity, in its modern maturation as the spirit of society under Democracy, plays a crucial part in providing the Jews with their place of special prominence in that society in keeping with their tribal aspirations. Not only professing Christians, sensitive to their creed's Jewish nexus, but as well the whole television public subjected to the leaven of Christian softness and submission -- variously known as "tolerance", "permissiveness", "compassion" and "humanitarianism" -- along with the constant and intensive Jewish and pro-Jewish political propaganda, are indoctrinated with deference to the Chosen Ones, even to the point of abject veneration.

In the resultant state of stupefaction they not only now themselves abstain from any solid criticism at all of the Chosen Ones, but approve punitive prohibition of the same for others as an offence coming close to profanity. This induced "political correctness" has reached a high point in the unquestioning acceptance of the Jewish holocaust legend as a cardinal article of Christian belief and jointly a dogma of Democracy, illustrating the concordance between the two in present society.

An example of the inhibitive effect of Jewish-derived Christianity, even decades ago, preventing any proper treatment of the Jewish Problem, and leading to the present paralysis in this respect, is the attitude of the Catholic Hillaire Belloc who wrote a book of severely restricted comment on the Chosen Ones entitled "The Jews", early this century. The secretary to whom he dictated it was a Jewess, the Jew Maurice Baring was his lifelong friend, and because Hitler broke the Jewish power in Germany in favour of his own people, he approved the carnage of a world war to punish Hitler and restore that power, writing as follows in "The Catholic and the War" in 1940:

"The Third Reich has treated its Jewish subjects with a contempt for justice which even if there had been no other action of the kind in other departments would be sufficient warranty for determining its elimination from Europe."

Colin Jordan